The Luke Barnes -Richard Carrier argument about fine-tuning

Barnes’ original response to Carrier’s book chapter, “Neither Life Nor the Universe Appear Intelligently Designed” in The End of Christianity:

https://letterstonature.wordpress.com/2013/12/13/probably-not-a-fine-tuned-critique-of-richard-carrier-part-1/

https://letterstonature.wordpress.com/2013/12/15/what-chance-looks-like-a-fine-tuned-critique-of-richard-carrier-part-2/

https://letterstonature.wordpress.com/2013/12/23/christmas-tripe-a-fine-tuned-critique-of-richard-carrier-part-3/

https://letterstonature.wordpress.com/2014/01/22/questions-for-richard-carrier/

Their exchange on Carrier’s blog:

Jeff Lowder’s coverage:

Carrier’s rebuttal to Barnes and Lowder:

Barnes’ response:

https://letterstonature.wordpress.com/2016/01/29/richard-carrier-one-liners-part-1/

https://letterstonature.wordpress.com/2016/01/31/richard-carrier-one-liners-part-2/

https://letterstonature.wordpress.com/2016/02/01/richard-carrier-one-liners-part-3/

https://letterstonature.wordpress.com/2016/02/05/final-word-on-richard-carrier/

Carrier’s final rebuttal:

One thought on “The Luke Barnes -Richard Carrier argument about fine-tuning

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s