The Luke Barnes -Richard Carrier argument about fine-tuning

Barnes’ original response to Carrier’s book chapter, “Neither Life Nor the Universe Appear Intelligently Designed” in The End of Christianity:

https://letterstonature.wordpress.com/2013/12/13/probably-not-a-fine-tuned-critique-of-richard-carrier-part-1/

https://letterstonature.wordpress.com/2013/12/15/what-chance-looks-like-a-fine-tuned-critique-of-richard-carrier-part-2/

https://letterstonature.wordpress.com/2013/12/23/christmas-tripe-a-fine-tuned-critique-of-richard-carrier-part-3/

https://letterstonature.wordpress.com/2014/01/22/questions-for-richard-carrier/

Their exchange on Carrier’s blog:

Merry Christmas, God Is Still a Delusion

Merry Christmas, God Is Still a Delusion

Jeff Lowder’s coverage:

The Carrier-Barnes Exchange on Fine-Tuning

Carrier’s rebuttal to Barnes and Lowder:

On the Bayesian Reversal of the Fine Tuning Argument by Sober, Ikeda, & Jefferys (against Barnes & Lowder)

Barnes’ response:

https://letterstonature.wordpress.com/2016/01/29/richard-carrier-one-liners-part-1/

https://letterstonature.wordpress.com/2016/01/31/richard-carrier-one-liners-part-2/

https://letterstonature.wordpress.com/2016/02/01/richard-carrier-one-liners-part-3/

https://letterstonature.wordpress.com/2016/02/05/final-word-on-richard-carrier/

Carrier’s final rebuttal:

Barnes Still Not Listening on the Bayesian Analysis of Fine Tuning Arguments